Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seth Earley's avatar

There are clear indicators that agentic approaches are evolving in the ways that you articulate. For organizations that can make the investment in advanced capabilities that form a competitive advantage (such as the trading firm example you provide) a number of foundational elements, built over years, have to be in place. For many orgs that I work with, just getting the basics in place is an enormous challenge. They don’t have harmonized data across their numerous customer facing systems, they are unable to repurpose componentized content for dynamic messaging, they don’t even have well structured product data enriched with the attributes that enable personalization for different customer needs (a procurement manager versus a design engineer in B2B for example). While AI can help with remediation, a reference architecture is needed (not trivial). I had one customer at a large enterprise say to me “this will never happen in my natural lifetime at [ABC company]”. They were making significant investments in these areas but the scale and scope were enormous (over a million pages of content, extremely complex solutions).

I once gave a presentation at a conference on orchestration of digital assets to enable personalization. Lots of slides and complex workflows - an in depth exploration of the issues and challenges etc) and someone raised their hand and said “but I just want to find my stuff…”.

Your Mar 23rd piece articulated these data challenges well https://open.substack.com/pub/abhiyadav/p/retails-ai-reckoning-why-your-data

Many orgs believe that they are missing the boat. In most cases they are not even near the ocean.

Expand full comment

No posts